top of page

UNIFIED FIELD TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH

"Myth busting" unquestioned assumptions with real science

Summary documents, including developing new theories, links and references

This is what over-unity is, a sympathetic inductive coupling between man's devices and nature's harmonic pulse.

                                                                                                                                                         - from Walter Russell's theory

Rodin Coil

 

Marko Rodin is the inventor that came up with this concept, which also is described by very interesting mathematics that one can easily get lost in - similar to and related to Vedic Mathematics.  The core for this attempt was created with hobby acrylic resin poured into a donut mold tray one-half at a time and pressing the half already cured onto the curing half. Map pins inserted while the second half was still curing, to serve as aids to proper wire wrapping according to the Rodin Coil principles.  Neodymium super magnet 1/2" ball (not shown) will 'float' in the core-contained magnetic field, or spin if placed in a small glass dish above the coil when energized with 6v DC.  Used #24 insulated magnetic winding wire. The original concept is the wires should not be insulated and the 'electrical shear' action of opposite electrical flow will automatically isolate individual wires. This easily constructed prototype gave surprising results, which was really not expected, given the low number of windings.  Obviously there is something to this new coil winding geometry! See http://1stopenergies.com/ to see current research into this. A very interesting phenomenon with this coil also, is that no north pole of the magnetic field it maintains in the 'hole' can be detected! According the Walter Russell everything has north and south (related to positive and negative) poles. So, where is the north pole? - compressed somehow, or.... hmmm.

Crystal Batteries

 

Crystal batteries have been an interesting research project, popularized amoung the DIY's by John Bedini, John Hutchinson and more recently, the QEG folks - Nick McKenny in particular - who has a 12v car battery converted into one. Nick came up with the formulation indicated in these photos: Borax (soap), Alum, KCl (potash), and Epsom salt.  Mixed (powdered/finely granulated) in equal propotions, then heated in a ceramic pot with 2 tablespoons of water to a pint of salts, it becomes a hot paste.  Pour the paste into either the copper pipe or the copper and magnesium (alternating) battery cell (cut apart lawn mower lead-acid battery case), and let cool (as magnesium electrode is inserted in the copper pipe version.  As it cooled it was was then zapped with two 18v Nicad batteries (in parallel) to align polarities in the crystal ionic lattices. The battery case has original recovered lead plates on the right, which gave less voltage and a lot less amperage (28.4mV 20.65 mA). Below the dark photo is a contest between 2 new energizer AA batteries and a pipe crystal battery connected in series with the Cu/Mg plated cell batteries (2) on the left side of the plastic cell case - which summed to 3.0v and 20mA, close to the 2 AA batteries at 3.0v and 100mA.  After 14 days the photo below was taken. At this point,  after disconnecting and reconnecting, the AA side was dead, but the crystal batteries were still going (LED lit). The crystal batteries tend to have less amperage, but have a curious quality of being able to somehow recharge themselves.  Eventually they degrade some (though some last a LONG time - years)..  The lower right photo is a crystal pipe battery (Cu+/Mg-) being recharged with a 'Bedini window motor' - which is another very interesting technology also, to be discussed elsewhere here.

Faraday Monopolar Motor

 

Here is a great science fair project - very simple; however understanding what is going on is not elementary, as is the case in attempting a very complete understanding of any electromagnetic action. This is a AA 1.5v battery (below) with a steel washer on top to keep the wire from wandering off of the positive pole.  The base is made of two neodymium super magnets with magnetization of N/S poles on top/bottom (or S/N - doesn't matter which orientation in this case). Neo super magnetics are very strong. Use care when handling, as they are what you might think of as very strong little entities that LOVE to click together at significant distances, or click onto any ferro (iron containing) material in the vicinity.  Learn to slide them apart, because you will not be able to pull them apart very easily, and they can nip your skin pretty hard if you're not careful.  So - grade school science fair? - with supervision, obviously. MIT would do well to explain this by the way. So, the balls are simple steel - mainly for giving it the :"cool" factor.  No real functional purpose.  After stripping the insulation off of a solid copper wire (not the 'stranded' variety), bend it into the shape shown so that the top 'indent' rests on the positive pole of the battery and the two ends rest against the little cylinder neo magnet clicked onto the bottom (negative) pole of the battery.  The poles of the battery, as you see are ferro (steel) so the magnets love them. If you have the wire bent just right when you let go of the wire it spins pretty fast (top right photo).  The bottom left photo version is another design option attempted by the author which is a little harder to get right with the wire spiral so that it is loose enough yet wound closely enough around the battery not to rattle around too much.

 

The wire conducts electricity from the super neo cylinder at the base to the top of the battery where it rests on the positive pole. As it does, the magnetic field around the wire that is the "elastic reponse to electrical flow" as Walter Russell described it (not quite the conventional terminology) interacts with the super neo cylinder magnet like a 'gear' rolling around a toothed 'sprocket.' Now this is how I am describing it; MIT might beg to differ, but there is abundant evidence of what you might call the 'gears' or  'slinky' model of magnetic fields. Not shown here, but if you take neodym cylinder or spherical magnets and click them onto a larger central 'sprocket' cylinder magnet (just regular smooth neo mags), they will automatically space themselves evenly around the outside of the cylinder and then if you move just one of them, they will all roll like gears around the cylinder. Just try to slide them and you will see what I am talking about!  So, this is very important to note, because if magnetic fields can gear that means (eureka!) they are not "abstract lines of force - but not really fibers" as current EM theory models them. We see many instances of practical inventors making use of properties not accounted for or even wrongly modeled by the theorists. This is one of them obviously. The old fibrous model that was considered in Maxwell's time (and rejected) may yet have some real substance after all; perhaps using Walter Russell's "pressure gradients" model will be of some use as a refinement.

 

So we see here a very good example of "hidden in plain sight from modern science" because of the way concepts were accepted, rejected or relegated to the dust bin.  Much research and recovery of early debates and concepts needs to be done along with new insights being gained. This is occurring - mostly under the radar / outside the box. Nature could really care less about how long it takes us to face facts, and She has very little intention of accomodating misconceptions; just reacting to actions, whether wise or very unwise.  Laws are laws (aside from the possiblity of some actual minute changes over billions of years, such as the speed of light, which then means they are not 'unalterable' or very 'fixed' primal laws; perhaps evolving in some way).

Bedini Window Motor Kit

 

The late John Bedini pushed the envelope on energy technology for decades (since the 60's). The author has tried his battery charging devices with good results.  He and Peter Lindemann and others have been exploring lead acid chemistry/physics and experiementing with making crystal batteries (see my experience above). Below is Mr. Bedini's "school girl" circuit window motor kit which the author constructed.  You will see I got it up over 11,000 rpm (revolutions per minute) - it hums pertty well at that speed! The basic idea is that current EM theory says you cannot get any more energy out of a electrical/magnetic field system than you put in - there is a net zero balance. John found that by constructing a compact little circuit in the right way to attempt to stop the "back emf" from cancelling the "power emf" flow, you could 'cheat' the unbreakable 'law' theory says is impossible to outwit. The author set up the bedini kit with a 12v lead acid lawn mower battery for the power input, and a close to identical 12v lead acid lawn mower battery for the motor to charge (output). Conventional theory says when you 'draw' on the motor to charge the output battery the motor HAS to slow down due to the current draw from the circuit. Ok, fair enough... let's give it a try. I run the motor with the input power battery connected only - something like 12,200 rpm's. Then, I connect the output/charging/'draw' battery.  Approximately 12,800 rpm's. Same results after attempting it again. There was a 600 rpm increase with the charging (drawing) battery connected. Could there be a way of explaining it apart from some kind of unknown ambient energy source giving the over unity results? Maybe. Maybe not, in which case I think there is something very important going on here. An MIT professor investigated this - this or similar Bedini kit built by a young science fair participant, and could not account for the results.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RPM's checked above.  Bedini motor - top right, with 6v lead acid

alarm batteries for input and charging/output.  Oscilliscope reading

- right, noting the high voltage pulsing (but low amperage) which

the window motor produces with the neodymium magnet rotor (6

flat rectangular magnets super-glued onto rotor and wrapped with 

nylon packing tape for safety purposes) spining past the copper 

coils (primary and trigger coils). The SSG circuit really is very 

simple (LR in UR photo)... you can find the schematic in media

related to John Bedini's work such as here or here.

Permanent Motion Holder

The photo below is of a "permanent motion holder" as Edward Leedskalnin termed it. Some of you may recognize the device as appearing similar to a horseshoe magnet with a 'keeper' bar on it. The difference between that and this device is that this was not a magnet initially. It is made from two pieces of common iron rebar used in concrete construction - not magnetized. What is fascinating to observe is the following... The small copper coil is wound on one side of the PMH 'U' bent bar. No special number of windings was adhered to. Then, with the bar touching the 'U,' one AA battery was connected to the two wires, one on the positive and one on the negative - for a split second. The bar then acts as if the 'U' is a magnet. Note there is nothing powering the coil any more to maintain the magnetic power. What magnetic energy is maintaining the connection against gravity, or a light pull on it? Actually it can be fairly strong, as if the 'U' is a horseshoe magnet. If the bar is pulled away, and a small 1.5v bulb (the kind from an old flashlight) or LED is connected to the wires, you will see a small flash of light. This indicates a fluctuation in a magnetic field, which one would assume is holding the bar. Now it gets even more interesting. If you then check the 'U' for magnetism, there is none detected. However, if the PHM is energized with another split second AA battery connection and bar is left on the 'U' for a period of time without any connection to a battery, and this one was left for two years, when the bar is pulled away, the light will again flash, but the 'U' now has some magnetization, apparent when you touch the straight bar against the 'U.' What magnetized the U? One assumes there is a magnetic field being maintained somehow that, in time, magentizes the U. But, wait, that implies that there is a magnetic field being maintained with no known source of external power (since the U was not a magnet) that magnetizes the U. It had to act over time (two years in this case) for the magetization to occur, with little or no degradation. it did magnetize with the original charge apparently (many conventional scientists might maintain that it did somehow, but that is quite contrary to the observations). Edward Leedskalnin maintained that the magnetic field was maintained kinetically as a kind of superconductive electric circuit, which could explain why it never 'runs down.' Superconductivity is one of the "holy grails" of science to provide power that will not degrade over time which enables creating circuits that require less energy and hence radiate less heat due to the efficiency (as in supercomputer technology). There recently have been indications of near room temperature superconductivity possible, with quite sohphisticated lab experiments. Ironic that this simple little device a grade schooler can make may indicate something quite important to look at! If one holds a magnetic field detection sheet (see the site intro) one can see small 'leakages' of the magnetic field around where the bar touches the 'U,' but no where else. It appears there is a magnetic field that is being 'contained' within the U and the bar, possibly as Leedskalnin described it - like a perpetual circulating electrical circuit. Normally, a magnetic field required to magnetize the 'U' would produce a very obvious external field. An interesting note here is that the Rodin coil (above) also has a peculiar property of 'containing' a very stong, concentrated magnetic field in the center of the 'donut hole,' quite different from the external field of typical coil windings. See the resource links and info page for related information.

The Vortex and Structured Water

Below is a vortex of water created by swirling around the water in the top liter bottle to get it started, then letting it run on its own. The bottle caps are 'gorilla glued' together with a neodymium ring magnet where the caps join, and the center cut out of the caps to provide a flow-through of the magnet and both caps. Smart water bottles worked very well for this. Another great science fair project for your students! There is a lot of fascinating physics to studying in vortexes such as this. According to recent models being used, there are actually two major interwoven spirals; one going into the point of concentration and one coming out of the point of concentration. Another observation is that there is a hexagonal 'eye' to hurricanes sometimes visible, which is strangely similar to the mysterious hexagonal 'eye' at the north pole of Saturn. See the vortex physics of Marko Rodin and Nassim Haramein in particular - links provided on links and resources page). This type of correlation stretches the conventional scientific mindset, but that is what new physics is all about; let's see if we can discover universal laws that may not be recognized currently. Accidental discoveries have been made many times when looking for something other than that discovered. Scientific research can be a journey with some unexpected encounters. Vortexes might be considered to be a subset of a more 'complete' phenomenon called "cavitation." This is discussed elsewhere on this site. Hold on to your seats with that one! To complete this commentary, this water vortex was made as part of an investigation into "structured water." Viktor Schauberger, Masaru Emoto, Patrick Flanagan, and Dan Winter are a few bright lights in that field of investigation. Jamie Buturff also has some key insights into what "structured water" may actually be about, as well as discovering some very important mathematical relationships involving frequencies and other recent discoveries. Products are becoming available for use by those interested in venturing into this area of exploration.

bottom of page