top of page

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Below are some questions that may not occurred to the reader yet, but very likely will as he or she learns more about topics addressed on this web site.

 

 

What is the importance of the emerging model of electromagnetics this site discusses; isn't the one we are using now good enough?  After all we have been using it quite effectively to develop T.V., radio and cell phone transmission networks. 

 

Since the turn of the century (late 1860's to present), there have been a number of key decisions made as to what is and what is not included in the current model of electromagnetism. Of special note is how Maxwell's 20 "quaternion equations" have been edited down to only 4 "vector" equations. Documents on the resources page and links provided to other sources describe this in more detail. In addition, the decision to model only "transverse" EM waves could be considered a major flaw in current working theory and calculations. The "longitudinal" component of electromagnetics, which Nikola Tesla explored gives indications of being a far superior component for EM transmissions in terms of energy efficiency and safety, so much so that conventional attempts to account for this component often gives rise to disbelief.

 

I've seen some information on "exotic free energy" and I wonder if it might have just as many draw-backs and dangers or worse than our conventional energy sources. What about that?

 

There have been many experimental demonstrations with a variety of approaches in which the "wheel work of nature" as N. Tesla termed it, has been tapped. Nikola Tesla used to transmit extremely high voltages across his body to light electric bulbs to demonstrate how electrical transmission can be done safely - and even wirelessly, which he also demonstrated - across  his body and with large towers and antennas. This was done with extremely high frequencies (do not try this at home!). Indications are that nature has ways of transferring energies that we live within all the time. We are a part of this sea of energy and interaction already. What could be safer? What is emerging is the realization that so far our approach to using energy and transmitting it has serious health risks already, and is a destructive and inefficient method that is primarily making use of the "entropic" side of nature (you might call it the 'disintegrative/dissipative/dying' side of nature). There is a growing discovery of a "syntropic" or "negentropic" compliment ('integrative/life-forming') that we have rarely ever attempted to use systematically, although there is significant evidence that some ancient civilizations may have made use of it. Edward Leedskalnin is a very interesting case in point of someone who may have re-discovered some of this knowledge. As knowledge increases with respect to new energy sources, traditional cautions and safety measures will simply be included in a far more inclusive understanding of energy sources we can tap, working in harmony with nature's laws. There is much we need to learn about electromagnetic (EM) frequencies, their affects on biological life, and how nature utilizes energy.

bottom of page